Video Presentations
Video Presentations
There are various philosophies, learning theories, historical, cultural, and political considerations that may serve as the foundation for curriculum plans and designs. You are tasked to create a 3-10-minute video presentation on your assigned topic. The presentation should incorporate a discussion of your assigned topic and how these contribute or influence curriculum development and planning. A specific example of a curriculum should be used to show how the assigned topic has influenced its design, structure, or implementation.
Procedure
- At the beginning of the semester, you were asked to choose from the following topics you would like to create a video presentation for. The topics include:
VP 1: Philosophical Foundations (Perennialism & Essentialism)
VP 2: Philosophical Foundations (Progressivism, Reconstructionism, & Constructivism)
VP 3: Psychological Foundations (Learning theories of Behaviorism & Cognitivism)
VP 4: Psychological Foundations (Learning theories of Humanism, Social Learning, & Experiential Learning)
VP 5: Socio-Cultural Foundations
VP 6: Historical Foundations
VP 7: Political & Environmental Foundations
- Search for and study materials for your chosen topic and create a video presentation using any format that you feel will be most effective in sharing the content with your classmates. You are free to decide how best this can be presented. Be as creative as you can.
You are free to use any presentation format, but make sure that the final output is a video of the presentation which should not exceed 10 minutes. Save your outputs in mp4 format following file name: HP211_VP[VP Number]_[surname]_[month day submitted]
Example: HP211_VP4_grageda_Oct20
- Share your video in this discussion thread.
- Watch the other presentations and provide comments to the videos of the others. Be sure to comment on all the videos.
Assessment Criteria
Your outputs will be assessed using the following scoring guide:
|
Criteria |
Exemplary
(3) |
Satisfactory
(2) |
Needs improvement (1) |
Unsatisfactory
(0) |
|
Description of the philosophy/learning theory
|
Created a clear picture of the philosophy/learning theory |
Clarity of description of the philosophy/learning theory |
Descriptions lacked clarity |
Philosophy/learning theory was identified but not described |
|
Described the elements of the philosophy/learning theory completely |
Described the salient elements of the philosophy/learning theory
|
Described 1-2 irrelevant elements of the philosophy/learning theory |
No description provided |
|
|
Information presented greatly contributed to illuminating the features of the chosen philosophy/learning theory |
Information presented was inconsistent with the features of the chosen philosophy/learning theory |
Information presented did not feature the chosen philosophy/learning theory |
No information was presented to feature the philosophy/learning theory |
|
|
Example provided were adequate and illustrated the philosophy/learning theory |
Example provided illustrated the application and use of the philosophy/learning theory, but was inadequate |
Example provided did not illustrate the philosophy/learning theory |
No example was provided to illustrate the philosophy/learning theory |
|
|
Quality of presentation
|
Presentation was engaging throughout its duration |
Presentation was engaging in most parts |
Presentation was engaging in some parts |
Presentation was not engaging throughout its duration |
|
Style of presentation was very creative |
Style of presentation was creative |
Style of presentation showed little creativity |
Style of presentation showed no creativity |
|
|
The technical quality of the presentation was excellent |
The technical quality of the presentation was acceptable |
The technical quality of the presentation needs improvement |
The technical quality of the presentation was poor |
|
|
Presentation was able to cover all necessary content within time limits. |
Presentation exceeded time limits but was necessary to the content. |
Length of presentation was within time limits but was lacking in content. |
Presentation unnecessarily exceeded time limits. |
|
|
Promptness |
Submitted output on time |
Submitted output 1-12 hours beyond the deadline |
Submitted output 1-5 days beyond the deadline |
Submitted output >5days beyond the deadline |
Total: 30 points
Submission date
Submission of videos must be in by Sept 24, 2024 9:00pm.
Post at least one comment on each of the other video submissions. You have until Sept 27, 2024 to view and comment on the videos. You may also respond to comments given to your presentation. Always remember to follow our class netiquette guidelines as we discussed during the course orientation when posting your comments and responses in the course site.
| Status | Discussion | Started by | Last post | Replies | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VP6: Historical Foundations
Locked
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
||
|
|
|
12 |
|
||
|
|
|
12 |
|
||
|
|
13 |
|
||
|
|
11 |
|
||
|
|
12 |
|
||
|
|
5 |
|
||
|
|
3 |
|
||
|
|
3 |
|
||
|
|
3 |
|
||
|
|
1 |
|