The assessment done by the clinical supervisor is in parts good and in parts bad. The good assessment he performed is the utilization of a standardized tool developed by the training committee of the institution. In this way the results may be valid and reliable. However, the scores should be applicable to the practice of physical therapy, as no set of criteria may be equal to all health professions and settings. Another is the doing feedback sessions with the students regarding the scores of the checklist, which in a way there is communication of the perceived performance of the student and the student is able to know his or her strengths or weaknesses. However, the CS used group feedback due to time constraints, which diminishes the specificity of the feedback to each intern.