Assignment #1: MY CLINICAL TEACHING PLAN: A REFLECTION OF MY TEACHING PHILOSOPHY TO BRIDGE THE GAP Due Sept 13,2023
MY CLINICAL TEACHING PLAN: A REFLECTION OF MY TEACHING PHILOSOPHY TO BRIDGE THE GAP
Task
After looking into the issues that contribute to the gap between student learning in the classroom and in the clinical setting, reflect on what this all means to you as a teacher and how you plan to do to narrow this gap. Express these thoughts in a reflection paper.
Procedure
1. Participate in the discussion forum (Activity #1).
2. Reflect on what this means to you and how you see it in your own setting by answering the following questions:
a. What are the issues that you see in your own clinical training programs that contribute to this gap?
b. What does all this mean to you? How does it relate to you own educational philosophy, learning theory and instructional theory? How does it affect you and your work as a clinical educator?
c. Considering these issues and your own beliefs and values in teaching and learning, what do you plan to teach in the clinical setting and how do you plan to do it?
5. Submit in MSWord or PDF format with the following file name: HP223_A1_[surname]_[month day submitted]
Example: HP223_A1_grageda_Sep25
You may also opt to input your output directly here in the site.
Assessment Criteria
Your outputs will be assessed using the following scoring guide:
|
Criteria |
Exemplary
(3) |
Satisfactory
(2) |
Needs improvement (1) |
Unsatisfactory
(0) |
|
Identification of issues
|
All issues identified were relevant to the gap between classroom to clinics that are relevant to their specific context |
Most issues identified were relevant to the gap between classroom to clinics that are relevant to their specific context |
Some Issues identified were relevant to the gap between classroom to clinics that are relevant to their specific context |
Issues identified were not relevant to the gap between classroom to clinics that are relevant to their specific context |
|
Meaning-making
|
Own interpretation of the issues was clearly presented |
Inconsistent clarity of own interpretation of the issues |
Own interpretation of the issues was unclear |
Did not present own interpretation of the issues |
|
Clear relationship of Interpretations to their own teaching philosophy was presented |
Relationship of interpretations to their own teaching philosophy was inconsistent in clarity |
Relationship of interpretations to their own teaching philosophy was unclear |
Relationship of interpretations to their own teaching philosophy was not presented |
|
|
Relevance of interpretations to their own teaching was clearly presented |
Relevance of interpretations to their own teaching was inconsistent in clarity of presentation |
Relevance of interpretations to their own teaching was unclear |
Relevance of interpretations to their own teaching was not presented |
|
|
Resolve
|
All elements of the plan or course of action was relevant to the issues identified |
Most elements of the plan or course of action was relevant to the issues identified |
Some elements of the plan or course of action was relevant to the issues identified |
Plan or course of action was not relevant to the issues identified |
|
Promptness |
Submitted output on time |
Submitted output 1-12 hours beyond the deadline |
Submitted output 1-5 days beyond the deadline |
Submitted output >5days beyond the deadline |
Total: 18 points
Submission date
Submissions of final versions of the assignments must be in by Feb 9, 2024 9:00pm.
You may also input it directly here in this site.