Task #7. Begin with the END in mind. The LAST requirement = My Learner Portfolio
My Learning Portfolio
I believe that the best way to assess if and what you have learned from this subject is not through a written exam. I am not interested on whether you memorized, understood or even applied the philosophical, psychological principles of learning.
What I have tried to do during the semester is give you some tools to understand yourself, the world and your learning process - in short, your metacognition. And I believe the best way to showcase what you have learned is through a Learning Portfolio.
Contents of the Portfolio:
All the WRITTEN OUTPUTS in class - whether reflection papers, individual or group reports, inventories, journal entrees... everything!
But this time PROCESSED. You may print out my feedback and reply to them, or you may simply reflect back on the activity and give me your thoughts about it- not just about that activity alone, but also in relation to the activities previous to that or any personal prior experience. In short....your Personal Learning Journey.
ASSESS the Activity in terms of its Relevance, Learning Potential, Fun factor. Feel free to rant and rave and give whatever comments and critique, preferably constructive. I will be using your inputs to either modify the activity or drop it.
Please write a PROLOGUE and/or EPILOGUE to piece the whole thing together. It's up to you if you want to give your work a Title or write a Dedication Page to whoever inspired you.
Layout of the Contents:
No prescribed layout. This is your portfolio so personalize it. Let your creative juices flow.
This will serve as your final exam.
Please view the following ViDEOS to help you plan your ePortfolios
1. Introduction to ePortfolios = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n8UG3YOOFU
2. E-Portfolios in Education- An ideal way to assess online = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kykfcqqr8T8&t=238s
Make sure to SHARE your Learner's Portfolio with me at mssalvacion@up.edu.ph
Rubrics for My Learning Journal
Criteria |
Exemplary (3) |
Satisfactory (2) |
Needs improvement (1) |
Unsatisfactory (0) |
Scope and Depth of Material |
Excellent re-processing of the experiences of the course, leading to a more profound learning than the first round. |
Went deeper into understanding the concepts covered in the course through the exercise of portfolio making |
Difference from the original submissions are purely in formatting. |
No added value. Basically just a compilation of the previously submitted works |
Thoroughness and depth of Analysis |
Analysis is fully substantiated and covers Relevance, Learning Potential and Fun Factor |
Analysis of the three prescribed focus was adequate. |
Superficial analysis of the three prescribed focus. |
No analysis of the Relevance, Learning Potential or Fun Factor |
Reflection and Metacognition
|
Exercised a thorough and deep reflection over one’s own beliefs about oneself, society, and education |
Showed sufficient self-knowledge, both in depth and focus. |
There were some minor vagaries and inconsistencies. |
There were major inconsistencies. (For example if one contradicts oneself) |
Critical Thinking |
Excellent content and development of arguments |
Arguments followed sound logic |
There were some errors and inconsistencies in logic |
There were major errors and inconsistencies |
Punctuality |
Submitted output on time |
Submitted output 1-12 hours beyond the deadline |
Submitted output 1-5 days beyond the deadline |
Submitted output >5days beyond the deadline |
Total = 15 pts
- 9 September 2021, 10:09 PM
- 9 September 2021, 10:09 PM