Write a proposition on the first 100 days of Marcos Jr. as president. Identify whether it is a fact, value, or policy proposition and explain it briefly.
In his first 100 days as president Marcos Jr. should have prioritized allocating for healthcare over expanding the infrastructure program of the previous administration.
This proposition is an example of a value proposition, more specifically a comparative value proposition, as it looks to weigh two things. In this case, it is healthcare versus infrastructure programs.
This proposition is an example of a value proposition, more specifically a comparative value proposition, as it looks to weigh two things. In this case, it is healthcare versus infrastructure programs.
I agree that this is a value proposition that compares two things.
This is a clear proposition of value as it aims to compare the level of priority between the two sectors. While both are indeed important, it would be interesting to see how one would defend the disparity of budget allocation between the healthcare programs and the infrastructure program.
"President Marcos Jr., during his first 100 days, should provide more job opportunities for Filipinos."
The statement above is a policy proposition because it creates a call to action to provide more job opportunities.
The statement above is a policy proposition because it creates a call to action to provide more job opportunities.
This does state a policy motion, it could be further specified to create a clearer focus by mentioning a particular sector or Filipino population wherein jobs are urgently needed.
This is what I was thought, also. Narrowing down the sector where more job opportunities are needed will create a clearer focus on the proposition.
This a good example of a policy proposition since, when expounded, can highlight the need for more job opportunities for Filipinos as well as the actions that can be done to address the issue.
Great example, Sai. This proposition of policy suggests an action in response to unemployment issues in the Philippines. This motion then proves that "providing more job opportunities" is a necessary, desirable, or viable action to address the mentioned problem.
Good example, Sai! The advocate of this proposition could provide factual cases to prove that there are existing unemployment problems and that it is necessary that something should be done to resolve the issue.
I agree with you, Sai. Your provided statement is indeed an example of a policy proposition.
Hi, Sai! This is a great proposition. I agree that it is a policy proposition because it involves decision making of the government on what action should be done to address the unemployment and unemployment of the country.
In his first 100 days as the country's current chief executive, Marcos Jr. wasn't as efficient in being the president as his supporters predicted he would have been.
Written above is a proposition of fact, as it focuses on establishing the verity of the given statement. It is also a proposition that has to be objectively verified.
Written above is a proposition of fact, as it focuses on establishing the verity of the given statement. It is also a proposition that has to be objectively verified.
This is a good example of a proposition of fact, it also shows objectivity in how it is stated by avoiding possible trigger words. For example, instead of saying there was a failure, you were able to address this as "wasn't as efficient."
I agree that this is a proposition of fact as it can be objectively verified.
Your statement allows an opponent to still defend their side with facts (emphasis on facts) which is an indication of a good proposition, Tina! I'd just like to think how that would actually play out? 🤔
Hi Alex! If I were to picture how this would turn up, I would say that the advocates would enumerate the worsening transportation crisis, soaring inflation, weakening of peso against dollar, among others, and contend that Marcos Jr. failed to alleviate these in his first 100 days in power.
The opponents on the other hand, I think, would retort by saying that while he has not done more for the issues stated above, he gave time and effort towards other matters. They might even say that Marcos Jr. exceeded their expectations because of it. They could point out that he has appointed bright individuals in the different government offices, prioritized agriculture (He considers implementing Masagana 150.) as he is also the DA secretary, and travelled overseas for 'investments'. They may further argue that even though his actions will not warrant results now, it might prove to be an ingenious move for the Filipinos in the future.
Great example, Tina. This proposition of fact seeks to alter the beliefs of BBM supporters who, up until now, still deem Marcos Jr. as an efficient president. I also agree with what Sai has mentioned—this motion can indeed be objectively verified by providing factual occurrences that indicate his inefficiency as the nation's president.
Good day, Tina!
I am not really certain, but I think this could also be a proposition of value since the term "efficient" is a word that can depict if something is good or bad. Also, there is a point of comparison between Marcos Jr.'s efficiency and his supporters' expected efficiency of him. Honestly, I am still confused, and so I would love to hear more thoughts about it.
I am not really certain, but I think this could also be a proposition of value since the term "efficient" is a word that can depict if something is good or bad. Also, there is a point of comparison between Marcos Jr.'s efficiency and his supporters' expected efficiency of him. Honestly, I am still confused, and so I would love to hear more thoughts about it.
Hi Kimbert! You were not wrong that this could also be a value proposition because I used the word 'efficient'. Propositions can really be tricky. The reason I identified this as a factual proposition was because, I imagine that if people were to argue this motion, it has to be in an objective manner and not in a subjective way, which is how value propositions are generally disputed.
You also hinted that this might be a comparative value proposition. I disagree with you on that. Just because there is a point of comparison between Marcos Jr.'s efficiency and his supporters' expected efficiency of him doesn't make this one. If I remember the reading correctly, it will only be a comparative value proposition if you evaluate a two-part value object with a value judgment term. If I were to make a comparative-value proposition, this is how it should be: "Noynoy Aquino was more efficient as president in his first 100 days than Marcos Jr. was during his".
You also hinted that this might be a comparative value proposition. I disagree with you on that. Just because there is a point of comparison between Marcos Jr.'s efficiency and his supporters' expected efficiency of him doesn't make this one. If I remember the reading correctly, it will only be a comparative value proposition if you evaluate a two-part value object with a value judgment term. If I were to make a comparative-value proposition, this is how it should be: "Noynoy Aquino was more efficient as president in his first 100 days than Marcos Jr. was during his".
I hope this eases your confusion. If it helps, you may also read my response to Alex's comment. :)
I also thought that Tina's proposition could be a proposition of value as it takes an evaluative stance in terms of the efficiency of Marcos Jr. as a president. I believe that 'efficiency' might be a subjective term, thus a need for a clear definition and laid-out criteria for justifying and measuring its value. Upon reading Tina's response, however, I was able to get a better understanding as to why she considered this as a proposition of fact.
Good example, Tina! Your proposition can be objectively verified through facts, such as the sudden rise of inflation, the weakening of the peso, high prices, and others. Your proposition also alters the beliefs of people, particularly BBM supporters, that Marcos was not an efficient president.
I commend your choice of words Tina, since you phrased your proposition to show neutrality (i.e., "wasn't as efficient"). Your reply to Alex of how this proposition plays out as facts is interesting and well thought of, since I would have considered as a proposition of value at first.
On his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should have prioritized helping Typhoon Karding victims over watching the Singapore GP F1 Race.
The above statement is a comparative value proposition that mainly looks at the two situations: Marcos Jr.’s response to the onslaught of Typhoon Karding and his attendance in the F1 Race overseas for “productive business purposes.” It weighs the two contexts and asserts that Marcos Jr. should have put first his countrymen affected by the typhoon and helped them through proper relief operations than going on the “business” trip with his family.
The above statement is a comparative value proposition that mainly looks at the two situations: Marcos Jr.’s response to the onslaught of Typhoon Karding and his attendance in the F1 Race overseas for “productive business purposes.” It weighs the two contexts and asserts that Marcos Jr. should have put first his countrymen affected by the typhoon and helped them through proper relief operations than going on the “business” trip with his family.
Your proposition is a clear example of a comparative value proposition, Alex! Much as I agree on your chosen proposition, I am also certain that we both share the same amount of frustration (for the lack of a better word) over the fact that our president has his own priorities that would not benefit the country in any way. Marcos Jr. certainly turns a blind eye from the urgent and pressing concerns of his people, thus having the face and confidence to attend to such prestigious personal events with a thought of repercussions.
This is a great example of a comparative value proposition, Alex! You were able to provide two things to be compared or measured to see which is more valuable in a certain scenario or environment. If given a chance to pick a side, I would definitely be on the government side.
This is a great example, Alex, and an accurate one, too! Your word choice and phrasing are also commendable. The statement made an assertion that Marcos Jr. should have put Filipinos first instead of his so-called business trip. It wasn't very reassuring how he handled the situation.
This is a well-written value proposition and I would surely want to be on the government's side in this debate. It is also worthy of mentioning in support of the proposition whether the Singapore GP F1 Race is indeed a productive business trip or not.
This is a good example of a comparative value proposition, Alex! It weighs the importance of two situations and takes an evaluative stance on which of these should be given priority. Since it also advocates a specific course of action, which is to prioritize one over the other, I believe that it can be a proposition of policy at the same time.
This is a good example, Alex! Given his absence during this time of crisis, it would be difficult for the opposition side to present arguments for the debate. Indeed, in times of crisis, it is his utmost responsibility to look after his people as the president.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should have prioritized implementing concrete plans to address inflation issues instead of attending parties.
This statement is an example of a proposition of comparative value, wherein the "thing" being evaluated or weighted is the action that ought to be taken in response to a national issue: implementing concrete plans or attending parties. Specifically, implementing concrete plans is deemed more valuable in this situation.
This statement is an example of a proposition of comparative value, wherein the "thing" being evaluated or weighted is the action that ought to be taken in response to a national issue: implementing concrete plans or attending parties. Specifically, implementing concrete plans is deemed more valuable in this situation.
That is a good example of a proposition of value, Paula! I share the same sentiments that PBBM should have laid out concrete plans on inflation as it burdens Filipinos. However, he insists on displaying disbelief on actual statistics about the worsening inflation.
The sudden rise in inflation during Marcos Jr.'s first 100 days as a president is a result of the negligence of his responsibilities.
The statement above is a proposition of fact, since the statement is a proposition focused on changing the belief of the opponent. The following statements would also try to prove why this is the case.
The statement above is a proposition of fact, since the statement is a proposition focused on changing the belief of the opponent. The following statements would also try to prove why this is the case.
Great example, Kimbert! Certainly, Marcos Jr.'s negligence and series of unfortunate and foolhardy decision-making can be classified as a cause of our economy's poor state.
I agree! With a 6.9% inflation rate, higher than the targetted 2%-4% target by the BSP, Filipinos are experiencing one hell of a roller coaster ride with very high utility and food prices that is affecting every industry.
Good example Bert! The statement can be proven/disproven through objective methods; thus, making it a proposition of fact.
In his first 100 days as president, Bongbong Marcos Jr. should resolve the transport crisis in the country.
The statement above is a proposition of policy as it creates a call to action. The proposition suggests that Marcos Jr. should do something to deal with commuter problems.
The statement above is a proposition of policy as it creates a call to action. The proposition suggests that Marcos Jr. should do something to deal with commuter problems.
This is a good example, Pauline! Indeed, this proposition recommends a change in behavior and a call to action.
On spot, Pau! Our transportation crisis has been causing headaches to millions of commuters for decades already and this issue must be highly prioritized among other social issues.
Great proposition, Pauline! Something should be done about our transport crisis. As a commuter, travel nowadays has become a burden because of the newly implemented policies and rerouted bus trips.
During the first 100 days of Marcos Jr. being the president, he should have prioritized his presidential duties instead of vlogging his extravagant and unreasonable lifestyle.
The statement above is an example of a comparative value proposition wherein the weight and importance of two ideas are compared. This statement asserts that during the first 100 days as a president, Marcos Jr. should have put aside his vlogging agenda and tended to his duties and the country’s needs more seriously and respectably.
The statement above is an example of a comparative value proposition wherein the weight and importance of two ideas are compared. This statement asserts that during the first 100 days as a president, Marcos Jr. should have put aside his vlogging agenda and tended to his duties and the country’s needs more seriously and respectably.
Great example, Rachel! I imagine opponents will justify that Marcos Jr.'s vlogs are mediums to share how he is fulfilling his presidential duties. Upon a quick scan of his Youtube channel, Marcos Jr.'s recent vlogs share his current responsibilities and initiatives as president. On the other hand, advocates justify that external reports say otherwise, and that the president is enjoying an extravagant lifestyle abroad which is conveniently excluded from his vlogs.
That’s right, Rachel. Your motion clearly shows an evaluation of the importance of the two different ideas. However, although I agree that his vlogs are centered on his extravagant and unreasonable lifestyle, I suggest omitting the modifiers first in stating the motion since the use of emotive language favors one side over the other that may lead to an exchange of emotional attacks, rather than actually arguing based on reasoning and proof.
I agree, Rachel. This is an accurate example. Indeed, his vlogs show the extravagant and unreasonable lifestyle they are living. However, I believe the statement should be improved so it won't sound subjective.
Marcos Jr. should have prioritized appointing a Department of Health secretary across the Cabinet-level departments In his first 100 days as president.
The proposition is a comparative value proposition between DOH and other Cabinet-level departments. For context, the Health Secretary position is the last to be filled under the Marcos Jr. administration because of "careful deliberation regarding the department's structure". Advocates of the proposition can justify how appointing a DOH secretary reflects the administration's prioritization towards public health in a pandemic which we are still experiencing. On the other hand, opponents can justify how prioritizing a different department is more efficient towards our country's growth, and that Marcos Jr. is being careful with the decision.
The proposition is a comparative value proposition between DOH and other Cabinet-level departments. For context, the Health Secretary position is the last to be filled under the Marcos Jr. administration because of "careful deliberation regarding the department's structure". Advocates of the proposition can justify how appointing a DOH secretary reflects the administration's prioritization towards public health in a pandemic which we are still experiencing. On the other hand, opponents can justify how prioritizing a different department is more efficient towards our country's growth, and that Marcos Jr. is being careful with the decision.
Good example! Others may mistake this as a policy proposition, but since it implies that the priority should have been for the appointment of a DOH secretary first prior to the other departments, it falls under being a value proposition.
Marcos Jr. should have developed concrete plans for the country’s economic recovery during his first 100 days as president.
The statement is classified as a proposition of policy as it advocates a specific course of action.
The statement is classified as a proposition of policy as it advocates a specific course of action.
I agree with your motion, Jai. Certainly, the Philippines have been one of the most affected developing countries during the onset of the pandemic and even until now. Jobs were lost, Filipino families were in dire need of economic support and stability, and our health workers are most impacted by burnout. These real-life observations should have been enough drivers for a genuine leader to prioritize economic recovery of the country instead of using our taxes for personal gains.
It is indeed a proposition of policy, Jai. Economic recovery is one of the major concerns during the election period due to the pandemic. Therefore, we should have had an idea of his plans to address economic recovery as early as his campaign period yet there are no concrete plans until now.
The late dictator’s son who is now the president of the Philippines should have prioritized eradicating poverty and economic crisis for his first 100 days in the office.
This is a prime example of the proposition of policy because it is directed towards a call for action.
In the first 100 days of Marcos Jr. as president of the Philippines, he should have redirected funding for economic stability.
The statement above is a policy proposition as it advocates for the specific course of action which is to redirect funding.
The statement above is a policy proposition as it advocates for the specific course of action which is to redirect funding.
That is indeed phrased as a clear statement of a change in behavior or a policy proposition, Andres. Furthermore, the specific course of action being advocated for can be proven reasonable by verifying facts, like where the funds were actually allocated, and by evaluating existing economic plans and policies, like how sufficient these are in terms of addressing the nation’s economic issues.
Ferdinand Marcos Jr. should have prioritized completing his cabinet members' appointment to lead the government agencies during his first 100 days as president
The statement is an example of a proposition of policy as it prescribes a call for action.
The statement is an example of a proposition of policy as it prescribes a call for action.
This is indeed a proposition of policy, and a proposition I would definitely agree to. I think it would also be interesting to watch the government rally behind the proposition and watch the opposition argue that the speed of cabinet appointment does not equate to efficient work.
This is a great example, Pia! It is indeed a proposition of policy as it necessitates a call for action given that the administration has been lax on choosing their cabinet members
Marcos Jr. should prioritize economic development and job building for the future of Filipinos
The above statement is a policy proposition because it argues for immediate action about the current state of the country. It implies that this specific action has not been done and is a necessity in the status quo.
The above statement is a policy proposition because it argues for immediate action about the current state of the country. It implies that this specific action has not been done and is a necessity in the status quo.
Great policy proposition, Jared! Your given statement calls for an action of prioritizing the provision of more jobs for our country and its people -- something that is very much vital for our economic growth.
For the first 100 days as a president, Marcos Jr. accomplished a functional government successfully.
The provided proposition above is an example of a value proposition, wherein it leans more on a personal evaluative stance---whether something, in this case, Marcos Jr.'s management, is excellently done or not.
The provided proposition above is an example of a value proposition, wherein it leans more on a personal evaluative stance---whether something, in this case, Marcos Jr.'s management, is excellently done or not.
I agree on your explanation Patrick, but not exactly with your proposition.
However, I believe that a proposition of value can be better phrased using degrees of comparison of adjectives. Perhaps stating that "Marcos Jr. accomplished the most functional government" (again: I don't believe this, stated only as example) would be a better proposition of value since judging the worth of his efforts can be very subjective. What are your thoughts?
However, I believe that a proposition of value can be better phrased using degrees of comparison of adjectives. Perhaps stating that "Marcos Jr. accomplished the most functional government" (again: I don't believe this, stated only as example) would be a better proposition of value since judging the worth of his efforts can be very subjective. What are your thoughts?
In his first 100 days as president, Bongbong Marcos Jr. should have appointed a secretary of health.
The statement above is an example of policy proposition. It suggests that there is something ought to be done in the health sector of our country. If used in a debate, the government side can use factual data and demonstrate why this proposal is the best option amidst the pandemic.
The statement above is an example of policy proposition. It suggests that there is something ought to be done in the health sector of our country. If used in a debate, the government side can use factual data and demonstrate why this proposal is the best option amidst the pandemic.
I agree with you, Llara. This would make an interesting topic for a debate. I would give my undivided attention to the opposition team in defending that the absence of a health chief amid a pandemic is a more desirable policy.
I share the same sentiments with Rod. This makes an interesting topic for debate. Personally, I think it should be a priority amidst the pandemic.
I agree. The pandemic is still ongoing. Much priority is needed especially with the ongoing health crisis.
That is a great example, Llara! As our country continues to undergo its post-pandemic recovery, the president should have put this on top of his list.
Marcos Jr. should prioritize resolving the food crisis, especially with the recent increase in the inflation rate. This statement is an example of a proposition of policy, as it indicates a call to action.
In his first 100 days, Marcos Jr. should have addressed the country's food insecurity and supply issues instead of partying and neglecting the needs of the Filipinos. The inflation rate is 7.7%, up from 6.9% the previous month. Filipinos will continue to struggle if he keeps providing band-aid solutions and does not address the problem directly.
Yes. This is nice. The call to action is very concrete in this example.
In his first 100 days of presidency and as the agriculture secretary, Marcos Jr. should actively resolve the sugar crisis.
The aforementioned proposition is an example of a policy proposition, as it calls for action, particularly in response to the 2022 Philippine sugar crisis and the continuous price increase of other related goods. The government side can mention the lack of response, and the Sugar Order No. 4 controversy which directed the importation of 300,000 metric tons of sugar to the Philippines, which was eventually revealed that was not signed and authorized by Marcos Jr. despite being publicized.
The aforementioned proposition is an example of a policy proposition, as it calls for action, particularly in response to the 2022 Philippine sugar crisis and the continuous price increase of other related goods. The government side can mention the lack of response, and the Sugar Order No. 4 controversy which directed the importation of 300,000 metric tons of sugar to the Philippines, which was eventually revealed that was not signed and authorized by Marcos Jr. despite being publicized.
This is a great policy proposition, Marielle! There is clearly a lack of response from the government and all the more disheartening to find Marcos Jr. taking credit from a law he did not author.
This is a timely and relevant policy proposition, Marielle. The prices of vegetables are skyrocketing. Food security and sustainable agriculture seem to be neglected in Marcos Jr's list of priority projects.
Good example, Marielle! I agree that this is a proposition of policy. The call of action presented is to address the sugar crisis negatively impacting the Filipino people.
Marcos Jr. was unable to address the inflation of prices within his first 100 days. This is a proposition of fact since it raises either the truth or falsity. It is also verifiable and can be supported through objectivity, through inference, and through logical processes.
I agree with you, Jaime. This is certainly a proposition of fact — one that I would definitely look forward to seeing in a debate. Currently, my bias leans toward the government side since basic consumer goods are notably more expensive than before. With this, I would like to see how the opposition side would refute this.
The first 100 days of Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s presidency should be marked by an enactment of a law that bridges the huge disparity of salaries between the uniformed personnel and other government employees.
The proposition is an example of a policy proposition. It suggests reforming or changing the existing policy of salary standardization among government employees.
The proposition is an example of a policy proposition. It suggests reforming or changing the existing policy of salary standardization among government employees.
In his first 100 days in office, Marcos Jr. should have appointed a DA secretary over attempting to fulfill the responsibility himself.
This proposition is an example of a comparative value proposition since it is a comparison of two situations.
This proposition is an example of a comparative value proposition since it is a comparison of two situations.
Nice comparative value proposition, Julian! The president already has a lot of roles to fulfill, so I think that he definitely should have appointed a DA Secretary instead of handling the responsibilities itself. With that said, I would still like to see how the opposition would refute this proposition.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should have prioritized filling the cabinet with qualified members of institutions, e.g. DOH, over personal endeavors and overseas socializing.
The proposition is a value proposition (comparative) since it weighs the actions that PBBM would've chosen between (DOH vs socializing overseas).
The proposition is a value proposition (comparative) since it weighs the actions that PBBM would've chosen between (DOH vs socializing overseas).
In his first 100 days as the president, BBM should have implemented austerity measures that would gradually mitigate the rapid deterioration of our flailing economy.
This statement is a policy proposition because it proposes a course of action that mandates stringent policies that would reduce government spending and public debt which would eventually yet temporarily minimize corruption.
This statement is a policy proposition because it proposes a course of action that mandates stringent policies that would reduce government spending and public debt which would eventually yet temporarily minimize corruption.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should prioritize strengthening the country’s alliance with the United States over its alliance with China.
This proposition is an example of a comparative value proposition — as it weighs two things. Specifically, this proposition is weighing the country’s alliance with the United States versus the country’s alliance with China.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr.'s governmental plans and priorities remain unclear and unreliable.
The aforementioned proposition is a value proposition as it takes an evaluative stance. It aims to assess the worth of BBM's plans and priorities and can therefore be defended or attacked with a criteria that justifies its value--specifically, clarity and reliability.
The aforementioned proposition is a value proposition as it takes an evaluative stance. It aims to assess the worth of BBM's plans and priorities and can therefore be defended or attacked with a criteria that justifies its value--specifically, clarity and reliability.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should prioritize transitioning back to face-to-face classes.
The aforementioned proposition is a proposition of policy since it advocates a call to action that something must be done. In this case, it is prioritizing the transition to face-to-face classes.
The aforementioned proposition is a proposition of policy since it advocates a call to action that something must be done. In this case, it is prioritizing the transition to face-to-face classes.
In his first 100 days as president, Marcos Jr. should have presented his plans on how to address and compeletely eradicate COVID-19 in the Philippines.
This statement is considered to be a proposition of policy because it recommends a call for action.
This statement is considered to be a proposition of policy because it recommends a call for action.