Fist batch of oral reports (For Dec. 22-25, 2021)

Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Maria Alexandra Dominique Bergonio -
Number of replies: 8

Good day, everyone!

We are Reicha P. Aumentado, Maria Alexandra Y. Bergonio, and Giancarlo G. Carpio from Bio 133 Lec 1 (W 4-7pm). Here is the link to our report on Johnson et al.'s 2014 article on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis: https://youtu.be/WjSx2_Ko2sE

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask us.

Thank you, and have a great day!

In reply to Maria Alexandra Dominique Bergonio

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Lydia LEONARDO -
I am sorry but I cannot access your presentation. Please check the link. Thanks.
In reply to Lydia LEONARDO

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Lydia LEONARDO -
Just want to let you know I was able to access your presentation. For some reason I could not access it on VLE but from the email that you sent, the link was accessed without any problem. That said, I just want to commend the group also for a very clear presentation and a thorough one too. I seem to detect a a very faint background music which was not as distracting. The background information was substantial further confirming my decision that indeed these reports will supplement whatever teaching materials I have previously uploaded. May I ask the following questions?
1. It seems humans have the lowest efficiency compared with the other mammals that you mentioned with rats having the highest. Could you propose an explanation for this?
2. The report that findings from this study can be used to develop contraceptive strategies. Can you explain how this can be so?
In reply to Lydia LEONARDO

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Giancarlo Carpio -
Good day Ma'am!

For the first question po:

First and foremost, rats are r-selected species—meaning that they have higher mortality and reproduction rates compared to k-selected species—such as humans. Rats reproduce more frequently because [1] they reach sexual maturity earlier, [2] they have shorter gestation periods (Hamid & Zakaria, 2012), and [3] they have efficient reproductive (e.g. spermatogenesis) capabilities (Johnson et al., 2014), among other reasons. Their spermatogenesis efficiency may be higher than other mammals such as humans because they can better adapt and survive in harsh environments, whereas other species are not as resilient, and respond negatively to even the slightest changes. With that said, humans may have the lowest efficiency of spermatogenesis because of several lifestyle- and environment-related factors such as poor diet choices (ingestion of preservatives and/or pesticides); obesity; smoking; and exposure to toxic chemicals and persistent environment pollutants. Because of these factors, effects on spermatogenesis (reversible) and sertoli cell number (potentially irreversible) become concerns (Sharpe, 2010).

For the second question po:

As reported, spermatogenesis is the process of development of sperm cells, while its efficiency is the estimated number of spermatozoa produced per day per gram of testicular parenchyma. By knowing its efficiency and understanding how it works, we can come up with male contraceptive methods, not only for humans but also for other animals.

One technique is through the exogenous administration of testosterone alone or along with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog to suppress gonadotropins such as luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. This way, it acts through the negative feedback loop on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, which ultimately reduces the endogenous testosterone release and prevents sperm production, thereby acting as a male contraceptive

To expound on this technique, low levels of LH lead to lower testosterone production by Leydig cells. Moreover, low levels of intratesticular testosterone and FSH suppress Sertoli cells, which facilitate the progression of germ cells to spermatozoa. Overall, these low testosterone levels will result in accelerated apoptosis, defects in spermiation, and sequestration of mature spermatozoa by Sertoli cells. In other words, this process will promote germ cell degeneration in males (Wang and Swerdloff, 2010).

Hope this answers your questions po!

References:
Hamid, H.Y. & Zakaria, Z.A.B. (2012, July 25). Reproductive Characteristics of the Female Laboratory Rat. African Journal of Biotechnology 12(19), pp. 2510-2514. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380711761_Hamid%20and%20Zakaria.pdf

Johnson, L., Varner, D.D., Roberts, M.E., Smith, T.L., Keillor, G.E., & Scrutchfield, W.L. (2014). Efficiency of Spermatogenesis: A comparative approach. Animal Reproduction Science 60-61, pp. 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00108-1

Sharpe, R.M. (2010, May 27). Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B3651697–1712
http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0206

Wang, C. & Swerdloff, R.C. (2010, November 10). Hormonal Approaches to Male contraception. Current opinion in urology, 20(6), 520–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833f1b4a
In reply to Maria Alexandra Dominique Bergonio

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Aryan Arenas -
Hello Gian, Reicha, and Alex!
I am Aryan from Group 4.

Thank you for the clear presentation! The points you tackled made us understand the lectures we had in our class better. The report is actually really interesting! I think that it opens several doors for research since possible reasons and further explanations for the different spermatogenesis efficiencies across species still need to be explored. It also made me wonder whether these efficiencies have changed over the course of evolutionary history or have remained constant.

Our group has one question for your group:
You mentioned that the low efficiency of human spermatogenesis does not seem to impose problems for human survival. But do you think humans are more likely to survive catastrophic events (that really threaten survival) if humans have a higher efficiency of spermatogenesis?

Thank you so much!!
In reply to Aryan Arenas

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Reicha Aumentado -
Hi, Aryan!! Thank you for that interesting question!
We can’t seem to find any study that answers your question directly but we do believe that if humans had higher spermatogenesis efficiency, they would more likely survive catastrophic events. In general, if humans had higher spermatogenesis efficiency, less people would become sterile. Should a catastrophic event happen, reproduction in their population would have a higher success rate than in a population with lower efficiency of spermatogenesis.

Thank you and happy holidays!
In reply to Maria Alexandra Dominique Bergonio

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Ruth Maxine Flores -
Hello, guys!
I am Ruth, in the same group with Geanine and Jewell!

Thank you for the very informative report! It was interesting to find out how spermatogenic efficiency could be estimated as well as learn about the factors that could influence the said efficiency of spermatogenesis.

This is a question from our group. It is a bit related with the question of Group 4 but is not necessarily limited to humans.

     Will high spermatogenic efficiency affect sperm competition for improved chances of reproductive success and survival?

Thank you and happy holidays!
In reply to Ruth Maxine Flores

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Reicha Aumentado -
Hi, Ruth!! Thank you for that wonderful question!
Males with high spermatozoa production have a higher success rate in fathering an offspring under the conditions of sperm competition than males with low spermatozoa production (Birkhead & Moller, 1998). A high efficiency of spermatogenesis can then improve the chances of reproductive success and survival since a male with high spermatogenesis efficiency is more likely to father an offspring. So to answer your question, yes, high spermatogenic efficiency can affect sperm competition but it is important to note that it is not the only factor that can affect it. Having a high spermatogenic efficiency doesn’t automatically mean that it will be the one chosen in a sperm competition because there are other factors being considered like sperm quality, etc.

Thank you and happy holidays!
In reply to Maria Alexandra Dominique Bergonio

Re: Bio 133 Lec1 (W 4-7pm) Reporting on the Efficiency of Spermatogenesis (Johnson et al., 2014)

by Leann Carmel Alanano -
Hello Reicha, Alex, and Gian!

This is Leann (from the same group as Danica and Lauriz) Thank you for the informative and well-organized video. It was really interesting to learn about the efficiency of spermatogenesis, seeing as it varies from species to species.

With that in mind, it was mentioned in the presentation that bulls have a lower efficiency of spermatogenesis than most species including the rats and horses examined, but still higher than that of humans. Would there be an explanation for this?

Thank you and hope you guys are having a great holiday!