HP 223 22-23 Sem 2: Mini-Research Project Due: Jun 1, 2023

Mini-Research Project Due: Jun 1, 2023

Research questions

Research Objectives

Data to be collected

Source of data

Data collection procedure

Data collection instrument

How will data be analyzed?

Due: Thursday, 1 June 2023, 9:00 PM

Make a submission

COMPETENCIES OF HEALTH PROFESSIONALS PERCEIVED AS MOST ESSENTIAL

BY CLINICAL TEACHERS

Task

In clinical teaching, it is important to determine the core competencies that graduates should be able to acquire and are considered in the development of clinical learning outcomes and deciding on learning activities. Your task is to conduct a simple research project to determine the competencies of health professionals perceived as most essential by clinical teachers and write a report of its findings. This task is to be performed in pairs or groups of three members.

Procedure

1. Submit a proposed research plan in the following format:

Title:

Setting:

Target sample and approx. number:

Proposed schedule:

Month	October	November	December
Activity/ Output
Person responsible

3. Once approval of the proposal is acquired, implement the research plan. Remember, this is just a mini-research project, not a thesis, so the number of data points need not be voluminous. What is important is that you are able to identify what pertinent information will be useful to collect to help validate the relevance of the core competencies as reviewed in the literature.

4. Collect your data and analyze it. Based on the results, come up with a prioritized list of competencies expected of health professionals and recommendations on how these competencies can be useful for the development and implementation of clinical teaching.

You may want to look into Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (W) as the statistical test to use for analysis. You can view a video tutorial here:

Real statistics using Excel

http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/interrater-reliability/kendalls-w/

5. Submit your written report in an MSWord file in the following format provided. Label your file submissions as file name: HP223_MRP_[surname of group members separated by space]_[month day submitted]

Example: HP223_MRP_grageda salvacion dicolen_Dec09

FORMAT OF REPORT

Abstract

- one page abstract following the format: Introduction, Objectives, Methodology, Results, Conclusion and Recommendations

Table of Contents

List of Figures

List of Tables

List of Appendices

Chapter I: Introduction

Background
Statement of the problem
Research questions and objectives
Significance
Operational definition of terms

Chapter II: Theoretical Background

Review of literature

Chapter III: Methodology

Study Design
Study Setting
Population and Sampling Technique
Data Collection Procedure
Data Processing and Analysis

Chapter IV. Results

- (Present according to your research objectives)

Chapter V: Discussion

- (Relate results to literature)

Chapter VI. Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations

References

Division of work

Describe the contribution of each group member in the conduct of the project and in the writing of the report
Self-assessment (using the rubric provided, as a group, assess your output and attach the accomplished rubric here)
Group reflection (What did you learn from the activity?)

Don’t forget to include the signed academic integrity statement at the last page of your work.

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY STATEMENT

As a student of the University of the Philippines, I pledge to act ethically and uphold the value of honor and excellence.

I understand that suspected misconduct on given assignments/examinations will be reported to the appropriate office and if established, will result in disciplinary action in accordance with University rules, policies and procedures. I may work with others only to the extent allowed by the Instructor.

___________________

Name and Signature

Student Number

Assessment Criteria

Your outputs will be assessed using the following scoring guide:

Criteria	Exemplary (3)	Satisfactory (2)	Needs improvement (1)	Unsatisfactory (0)
Abstract	All elements of the abstract were presented	Most elements of the abstract were presented	Only 1-2 elements of the abstract were presented	Abstract was not presented
	Abstract presented the main points of the research cleary	Clarity of the main points presented in the abstract of the research was inconsistent	Main points presented in the abstract of the research was not clear	Abstract was not presented
	Entire abstract was concise	Major aspects of the abstract were presented with conciseness	Abstract was too wordy	Abstract was too wordy and exceeded the one-page limit
Introduction	Background clearly described the context of the research problem	Clearly described major aspects of the context of the research problem	Description focused mainly on aspects not relevant to the research problem	Did not describe the context of the research problem
	Research problem was clearly stated	Major aspects of the research problem was clearly stated	Research problem was not clearly stated	Research problem was not stated
	All research questions were clearly stated	Most of the research questions were clearly stated	Research questions were vague	Research questions were not presented
	All research objectives adhered to the elements of a good research objective	Most research objectives adhered to the elements of a good research objective	Research objectives adhered to some of the elements of a good research objective	All research objectives did not adhere to the elements of a good research objective
Theoretical Background	Review of related literature provided substantial theoretical support to the research	Review of related literature provided acceptable theoretical support to the research	Review of related literature provided lacked substantial theoretical support to the research	Review of related literature did not provide substantial theoretical support to the research
	Literature reviewed were relevant and up to date	Literature reviewed were relevant and most were up to date	Literature reviewed were relevant but outdated	Literature reviewed were not relevant and outdated
	Literature reviewed was presented in a logically organized manner	Most of the literature reviewed was presented in a logically organized manner	Presentation of most of the literature reviewed was unorganized	Presentation of literature reviewed was unorganized and confusing
	All sources were appropriately cited and consistently followed the APA format	All sources were appropriately cited with some inconsistencies in following the APA format	Not all sources were appropriately cited and did not follow the APA format	Sources were not cited and did not follow the APA format
Methodology	Research design used was consistent and with the research questions & objectives and was justified well	Research design used was consistent with the research questions & objectives and fairly justified	Research design used was consistent with the research questions & objectives, but no justification was provided.	Research design used was inconsistent with the research questions & objectives
	Study design used was comprehensively described	Most elements of the study design used was described	Fair description of the study design used was presented	Study design used was not described
	Study population and sample was comprehensively described	Most elements of the study population and sample was described	Fair description of the study population and sample was presented	Study population and sample was not described
	Sampling technique used was comprehensively described	Most elements of the sampling technique used was described	Fair description of the sampling technique used was presented	Sampling technique used was not described
	Data collection procedure was described clearly	Main components of the data collection process were described clearly	Description of data collection procedure was vague	Data collection procedure was not described
	Data collected was relevant to the research objectives	Most of the data collected was relevant to the research objectives	Some of the data collected was relevant to the research objectives	Data collected was relevant to the research objectives
Results	Results were presented clearly	Main components of the results were described clearly	Description of results was vague	Results were not described
	Analysis of data was accurate and consistent with research objectives and data collection procedures	Analysis of data was mostly accurate and consistent with research objectives and data collection procedures	Analysis of most data was inaccurate and inconsistent with research objectives and data collection procedures	Analysis of data was inaccurate and inconsistent with research objectives and data collection procedures
	Analysis of results was in-depth	Analysis of results was adequate	Analysis of results was superficial	Results were not analyzed
Discussion	Results were explained and discussed clearly	Inconsistent clarity in the discussion of results	Unclear discussion of results	Results were not discussed
Discussion	All results were related to the literature reviewed	Most of the results were related to the literature reviewed	Most of the results were not related to the literature reviewed	Results were not related to the literature reviewed
Summary, Conclusion & Recommenda-tions	Summary was complete and concise	Summary was mostly complete and concise	Summary was incomplete and lacked conciseness	Summary was not presented
	Conclusions were consistent with research objectives and results	Most of the conclusion statements were consistent with research objectives and results	Some of the conclusion statements were consistent with research objectives and results	Conclusions were not consistent with research objectives and results
	All recommendations were consistent with conclusion	Most recommendations were consistent with conclusion	Recommendations were not consistent with conclusion	No recommendations were provided
References	All references were included	Cited references were included	Reference list was incomplete	No references were reported
References	Reference list followed the recommended APA format	Reference list followed the recommended APA format	Most references in the list did not followed the recommended APA format	All references in the list did not follow the recommended APA format
Format	Followed the recommended format	Most parts of the report followed the recommended format	Most parts of the report did not follow the recommended format	Did not follow the recommended format
Promptness	Submitted output on time	Submitted output 1-12 hours beyond the deadline	Submitted output 1-5 days beyond the deadline	Submitted output >5days beyond the deadline
Division of work	Division of work was fair for all members	Division of work was fair for most members	Division of work was fair for some members	Work was not divided among members

Total: 90 points

Submission date

Submitted proposals must be in by Mar 16, 2023 9:00pm. Submit in MSWord file with file name: HP223_MRPPROPOSED_[surname of all members separated by space]_[month day submitted]

Example: HP223_MRPPROPOSED_grageda salvacion dicolen_Oct16

This will be returned with feedback and suggestions by October 19, 2022

Draft submissions of the final report should be submitted before Mar 22, 2023 at 8:00am to receive formative feedback which will be sent to you by May 29, 2023. Draft submissions should be in MSWord format with file name: HP223_MRPDRAFT_[surname of all members separated by space]_[month day submitted]

Example: HP223_MRPDRAFT_grageda salvacion dicolen_Dec18

Final reports are due on Jun 1, 2023 9:00pm. Final versions returned with advice for re-submission will be given a specific deadline. Please make sure to meet that deadline. Your assessment score will be based on your re-submission.

Re-submission of final versions that were not advised to do so may be done anytime for additional feedback. These will be returned at least 1 week after re-submission. Just remember that your assessment score will still be based on your final submission and not your re-submission.