Multimodal Presentation (Group Work)
Assignment Guide for the Multimodal Presentation
Procedure
- This group output is to assess your creative ability to weave the knowledge that you have gained from Modules 5 and 6 through a multimodal presentation, e.g., a video presentation of insights you have gained after studying basic concepts on culture and communication, and their application.To review what a multimodal presentation is, watch this video: Multimodality or search the YouTube for videos on how to create multimodal compositions or presentations.
2. The video should be at the maximum 15 minutes long. The group members should be in the video. PowerPoint presentations may be incorporated in the multimodal presentations provided that these PowerPoint presentations are accompanied by explanatory voice-overs. The multimodal outputs would have to be saved as a video file.
3. Save your work and submit it to me via the Googl Drive folder. Use the file name
MULTIMODAL PRESENTATION Group ____ (surnames, first names of the members of the group).
4. The work should be submitted on or before 25 November 2024 and should be ready for presentation on 25 November and 02 December 2024, depending on the schedule for each group.
Evaluation Criteria
CRITERIA |
1 POINT |
3 POINTS |
5 POINTS |
YOUR SCORE |
Organization |
There is no clear plan of staging ideas, i.e., a meaningful sequencing of ideas expressed in the multimodal elements (ME), e.g., photos, videos, graphics, sounds, which contribute to the clear expression of the composition’s overall meaning. |
A plan of staging ideas can be sensed but it does not prepare the viewer for the receiving the main content of the composition. |
There is a clear plan of staging ideas, which contribute to the effective delivery of the composition’s message. |
|
Conciseness and Coherence |
There are MEs that prevent a clear delivery of the multimodal composition’s overall meaning. |
A few of the MEs, do not contribute to the overall meaning of the multimodal composition. |
Each of the MEs serves a clear purpose to deliver the composition’s overall meaning. |
|
Grammar and style |
There are many unacceptable verbal-text constructions. |
There are a few unacceptable verbal-text constructions. |
The verbal texts are free of grammatical inconsistencies. |
|
Appropriateness |
There are MEs that are not appropriate to the genre (e.g., a report, a vlog, presentation) and/or audience (professor and classmates). |
Some MEs are not appropriate to the genre and/or audience. |
Most of the MEs are appropriate to both genre and audience. |
|
Content and logic |
Most of the arguments are not supported by sound premises. Most of the claims are irrelevant, information are inaccurate, and credible sources are lacking. |
A few of the arguments are not well-supported by sound premises. Some of the claims are irrelevant, information are slightly inaccurate, and a few credible sources are provided. |
All the arguments are well-supported by sound premises. The composition exhibits a high degree of accuracy and credibility and is of high relevance to the question at hand. |
|
TOTAL |
/25 |